Technical GEO intelligence

Site Analysis

Discover and approve the right website scope, then generate an evidence-backed technical GEO audit.

Previous site analyses

Open a completed audit to view its full results.

5 recent audits
AnalysisWebsiteStatusCompletedScopeScore
Acme Health GEO Technical AuditPublished reportacmehealth.comCompletedAug 24, 202652 pages7.2/10
July Readiness BaselineInternal draftacmehealth.comCompletedJul 9, 202648 pages6.8/10
Product Launch Scope AuditPublished reportacmehealth.com/solutionsCompletedJun 12, 202631 pages7.5/10
Employer Content ArchitectureInternal draftacmehealth.comCompletedMay 17, 202644 pages6.4/10
Q1 Technical BaselineArchivedacmehealth.comCompletedMar 28, 202639 pages5.9/10

Start a new site analysis

Discover URLs, review the complete inventory, approve the exact scope, then begin analysis.

Completed technical GEO audit

Site Analysis Results

Evidence-backed findings across every approved page and all seven technical GEO factors.

Generated by SixWingsInternal draftAudit date Aug 24, 2026

Acme Health GEO Technical Audit

https://acmehealth.com52 approved pagesCompleted in 2h 14m

Overall score7.2/10
Scorecard factors7
Critical findings1
Roadmap actions12

Overall verdict: Technically sound and broadly crawlable, but not yet deliberately structured for AI retrieval. The most material gaps are the missing llms.txt, uneven service-level schema, and weak links between high-value resources and canonical product pages.

Executive summary

High-level site readiness narrative.

Confidence: high

Acme Health has a strong technical foundation and clear employer-facing architecture, but several gaps reduce its usefulness to AI crawlers and answer engines. Core commercial pages are crawlable and well titled, while llms.txt is missing, schema is uneven outside the homepage, and important entity claims vary across older resources. The highest-impact work is to establish explicit AI guidance, standardize Organization and Service schema, and strengthen internal paths from educational resources into the canonical product narrative.

Seven-factor scorecard

Observed current state scored from 0 to 10.

7 factors
#FactorScoreOne-line verdict

Detailed findings

One evidence-grounded finding for each scorecard factor.

7 findings

Prioritized roadmap

Action plan grouped by the current three-tier report contract.

12 actions
Tier 1

Critical / do first

Resolve the most material retrieval and factual risks.

  1. Publish a reviewed llms.txt.
  2. Confirm and correct the canonical coverage claim.
  3. Add Service schema to four priority pages.
  4. Repair conflicting canonical signals.
Tier 2

High impact, low/medium effort

Improve entity context and discovery across the site.

  1. Build resource-to-product link paths.
  2. Add Article schema to eligible resources.
  3. Rewrite duplicated resource titles.
  4. Add canonical evidence blocks.
Tier 3

Later optimizations

Operationalize quality and prevent regressions.

  1. Create a canonical claim registry.
  2. Monitor crawler access changes.
  3. Review structured data regularly.
  4. Re-run the same approved scope.

Evidence and appendix

Supporting notes, coverage, exact URLs and retained limitations.

Verified
4. Cross-Cutting NotesPatterns affecting multiple scorecard factors
  • Brand consistency and metadata issues cluster in resources published before the 2025 positioning update.
  • The strongest entity information exists on the homepage but is not inherited consistently by service and article templates.
  • Three legacy URLs could not be verified and remain documented as uncertainty.
6. Appendix A — EvidenceComplete evidence ledger grouped by all seven factors
52/52approved pages analyzed
364 factor checks completedEvery approved page was assessed across all seven factors.
0 pages silently sampledAll included commercial pages remain in the evidence ledger.
Technical artifacts retainedHTML, rendered DOM, metadata, schema, robots and crawl paths are traceable.
Finding citations verifiedEvery report claim resolves to an inspected URL or artifact.
Appendix B — Coverage and immutable caveatsCollection status and analysis limitations
  • Pages discovered and analyzed: 52.
  • Pages collected successfully: 52; retained collection failures: 0.
  • Sitemaps processed: 3.
  • Scores describe the observed state and award no credit for unimplemented recommendations.
Appendix C — Analyzed URLsComplete approved URL inventory

All 52 included URLs would appear here with final resolved URLs and retained collection status.

Appendix D — Sitemap inventoryProcessed sitemap files and discovery status
  • https://acmehealth.com/sitemap.xml — processed
  • https://acmehealth.com/pages-sitemap.xml — processed
  • https://acmehealth.com/resources-sitemap.xml — processed
Internal source and parser diagnosticsOriginal audit Markdown retained for traceability
# GEO Technical Site Audit — Acme Health

## 1. Executive Summary
Acme Health has a strong technical foundation...

## 2. Scorecard
| # | Factor | Score | One-line verdict |
| 1 | AI crawler access (robots.txt) | 8.5/10 | Major AI crawlers are allowed... |

## 3. Detailed Findings
### 3.1 AI crawler access (robots.txt) (8.5/10)
**What we found.** ...
**Why it matters.** ...
**Recommendations.** ...

This raw source remains internal and is not rendered directly in the client portal.